Skip to main content

The Bible, Peter, Mary, Confession and Mass

   



Catholic Issues


The author of this article is familiar with the many differences between Protestants and Catholics. These differences are important, for they affect our life, faith and salvation. In this short article, I will examine the following key issues: The Supremacy of Scripture; The Place of Peter; The Place of Mary; Confession to Priests; and the Sacrifice of the Mass.

The Supremacy of Scripture: Paul wrote, “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly equipped for every good work. I charge you therefore before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at His appearing and His kingdom: Preach the word! … For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned to fables.” 2 Tim. 3:15,16; 4:1,3,4. Here we are told that the Scripture defines doctrine, not the Church. The Scripture is to “correct” us when we stray. Through the Scriptures we can be “perfect.” In the light of Christ’s return, we are to “Preach the word!” not the doctrines of men. Paul said many will turn from the truth to fables. How can we tell what is “truth” and what is a “fable”? By the Word. Jesus wants to “cleanse [the church] with the washing of water by the word.” Eph. 5:26.

The Place of Peter: Rome declares that God’s Church is “built on Peter,” and that “Peter will remain the unshakable rock of the Church.” Catechism of the Catholic Church, p. 141. (1994). Is this the truth or a fable? How can we find out? By the Word. The primary passage used to support Rome’s idea is Mat. 16:18. The context reveals that Peter acknowledged who Jesus Himself was – the Christ (vs. 16). Then Jesus said, “And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock will I build My church” (vs. 18). Rome says Jesus meant that Peter was the Rock, yet Christ did not say this. He didn’t say, “You are Peter, and on you I will build my church.” Rather, He said, “You are Peter, and on this rock …” Protestants believe “this rock” is Jesus Christ Himself, not Peter. The Bible says, “…that Rock was Christ.” 1 Cor. 10:4. David said, “The Lord is my Rock.” Psalm 18:2. “For no other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. If anyone builds on this foundation …” 1 Cor. 3:11,12. Thus the Word says we should build on Christ, not Peter.
Rome says Peter was the first Pope – that is, Number 1 among the apostles. Yet Peter himself said he was only “a fellow elder.” 1 Peter 5:1. Peter would not let anyone bow down at his feet in reverence (Acts 10:25,26). Paul rebuked Peter (Gal. 2:11). James led the Jerusalem council, not Peter (Acts 15:13,19). If Peter was the first Pope, and God intended His church to believe this, then why didn’t Paul mention Peter even one time in his letter to the Church of Rome? Paul’s epistle to the Romans never mentions his name. This is highly significant. If we stick to the Word, we do not find the supremacy of Peter.

The Place of Mary: Mary was the chosen vessel through whom Christ was born. Mat. 1:20-23. The angel Gabriel said she was “highly favored,” and “blessed among women.” Luke 1:28. When Jesus grew up, He did honor his mother in the Gospels, but He did not exalt Mary above other women. In fact, Jesus even said, “For whoever does the will of My Father in heaven is My brother and sister and mother.” Mat. 12:50. Thus anyone who does God’s will is just like His mother. Outside the Gospels, we discover that the name of Mary is hardly mentioned in the rest of the New Testament! Peter, who was supposedly the first Pope, didn’t say a word about Mary in his letters. And Paul, in his letter to the Romans, mentions the name of Mary only once (Romans 16:6), yet he was probably not speaking about the mother of Jesus. There is absolutely no reference to Mary in any of his other epistles, which were practical letters written to the early churches. No Christian was taught in the New Testament to say a prayer to Mary. Rome says that Mary now has a “saving office” that can bring us “the gifts of eternal salvation,” and that she carries “the titles of Advocate, Helper, Benefactress, and Mediatrix.” Catechism of the Catholic Church, p. 252. Yet not only are these titles not applied to Mary in the Bible, they are also contrary to the Word, which says, “There is one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus.” 1 Tim. 2:5.

Confession to Priests: Rome says we should confess our sins to priests, yet the Word doesn’t teach this. James wrote, “Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed.” James 5:16 (KJV). This is not the same as confessing sins to a priest, but rather means that we should confess our faults to each other, and pray for each other. David wrote, “I will confess my transgressions to the Lord, and You forgave the iniquity of my sin.” Ps. 32:5. “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” 1 John 1:9. Thus we should confess our sins to God who alone can forgive. The practice of confessing one’s sins to another sinner is not only degrading to the confessor, but harmful to the hearer. Paul said “it is shameful even to speak” of certain sins. Eph. 5:12. If we sin against someone, we should make it right with them, but otherwise, we should not confess our sins to another sinner. If we do, we are planting the seeds of evil in another mind. Paul wrote, “Let no corrupt word proceed out of your mouth, but what is good for necessary edification, that it may impart grace to the hearers.” Eph. 4:29. If we confess our sins to a priest, we are disobeying this Word, and will only impart evil “to the hearers.” We should confess our sins to Jesus Christ! He can handle it, and He will forgive us.

The Sacrifice of the Mass: Rome says that when her priests break the communion bread, this is an actual reenactment of the very Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. “The Mass is an unbloody re-enactment of the sacrifice of Calvary.” The Faith of Millions: The Credentials of the Catholic Church, by Rev. John A. O’Brien. p. 355 (1955). In the Mass, “Christ Is Sacrificed Again.” Ibid. 354. Is this truth or a fable? How can we find out? By the Word. The book of Hebrews is clear. Paul wrote about “the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.” Heb. 10:10. “But this Man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God” (vs. 12). “For by one offering he has perfected forever those who are being sanctified” (vs. 14). Thus the Bible is clear. There is only one Sacrifice, and it occurred on the cross. Christians should put their total faith in what Jesus has already done two thousand years ago. Any teaching about another sacrifice is really a denial of what Jesus Christ has already done “once for all” (Heb. 10:10) and represents a diversion away from Christ’s love and truth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Christ our Righteousness Bible Study (Part 1)

Approximately 600 years before our Savior was born in Bethlehem, Jeremiah predicted, “Behold, the days are coming,” says the LORD, “That I will raise to David a Branch of righteousness;  A King shall reign and prosper,  And execute judgment and righteousness in the earth.  In His days Judah will be saved,  And Israel will dwell safely;  Now this is His name by which He will be called: THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS” (Jer. 23:5,6) This is a prophecy about Jesus Christ. Not only is He called “A King” and “a Branch of righteousness,” but Jeremiah specifically predicted that “He will be called” by a special name—”THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.” Two things impress me here: 1) That special name, and 2) That “He will be called” by it. Who do you think will call Him by that name? It seems to me that the answer is: His people will call Him that. Now I ask you, “What percentage of present-day Christians do you think have ever called our Savior by that name?” Proba...

RESURRECTION HOPE IN CHRIST

What is the hope we have, if there is not resurrection after death?  Jesus has giving hope to all those that come to Him, to known the Eternal God through the power of the Holy Spirit of God. " For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.  If a man die, shall he live again ?   all the days of my appointed time will I wait, till my change come.  Thou shalt call, and I will answer thee:   thou wilt have a desire to the work of thine hands;   And though after my skin worms destroy this body , yet in my flesh shall I see God:  Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another.   for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth;  they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life;  and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.   ( 1 Thessa...

Pope Francis, Two Beasts, and the Devil’s Deadly Mark (Part 3)

     “Truth is stranger than fiction” is a popular saying. Brace yourself. You are about to discover strange things, but they are factual. The Holy Bible predicts that during Earth’s darkest hour a sinister deception called “the mark of the beast” (see Revelation 19:20) will be legislated by earthly governments as a misguided solution to a global crisis. Finally, “no one may buy or sell except the one who has the mark” (Revelation 13:17). Those who settle into this delusion—after being earnestly warned by a loving Creator to reject the devil’s deadly mark—will reap the just “wrath of God” (see Revelation 14:9-11), and be doomed forever. Sound serious? It is. Keep reading. What is this mysterious mark? If you Google “mark of the beast,” you’ll find plenty of opinions on the Internet. But honestly, this topic is far too important to practice “theology by Google.” Instead, first and foremost we must examine what the Bible actually says. After all, the “mark” is a Bible ...